Note: First and Second Reading in both houses must take place on consecutive legislative days. It takes at least five legislative days to pass a bill or joint resolution, assuming that Third Reading in the house of origin and First Reading in the second house take place on the third day. Infrequently bills skip the committee step and are referred Direct to Calendar. This places the bill on General Order for consideration by the full body without a committee recommendation.
Very often, bill summaries or other supplementary materials for floor consideration are coordinated by the authors. Members can have materials passed out on the floor, but the materials must indicate the member responsible for distribution. The public cannot circulate information to be placed on the floor. The public can distribute information to the members' post office boxes, however, by first presenting it to the Speaker's or President Pro Tempore's office.
When the presiding officer decides that a measure is ready to be discussed, the principal author will be recognized for the explanation of the bill. By rule, the explanation cannot include a discussion of the merits of the bill. For appropriation bills, the chair or another member of the subcommittee that handled the bill often will offer the explanation.
House and Senate rules determine the bills and joint resolutions on general order that are subject to amendment and debate; and whether those from the consent calendar cannot be amended or debated. Suspension of the rule can prevent amendment of bills, but that is rarely done since it would require a two-thirds vote. More commonly, a member will move to advance the measure which, if approved, will cut off any further amendments. Amendments must be prepared on separate pieces of paper (amendment forms are available) and must be submitted to the clerk at the front of the Chamber. A motion to lay an amendment on the table (popularly called tabling motion) or to advance the bill can be offered at this point. If successful, this motion would defeat the amendment. In addition, a member can ask for the vote on any amendment to be reconsidered, but that motion is debatable. Votes on amendments, if a division is requested, are conducted by an electronic roll call. Red signals opposition and green support. A member can change a vote up to the point that the presiding officer closes the vote. The rules also allow a motion to send a bill back to committee.
Before debate on the bill itself, the presiding officer will advance the bill to Third Reading for a vote. House and Senate rules indicate that engrossment occurs before Third Reading, but in practice, the presiding officer will indicate that the measure is considered engrossed; once a measure is passed on Third Reading, it will be actually engrossed. Debate on a measure will precede the final vote on the measure. Filibusters on a measure are not permissible in the House of Representatives as they are in the State Senate. Debate, by House rules, is limited to one hour divided equally between the proponents and opponents. Five minutes of the proponents' time is allocated to the principal author who will close the debate. The presiding officer will request all those wishing to debate to indicate their intent to do so by show of hands. The presiding officer will list those in support and in opposition to the measure. Members can then yield their time to another member who shares the same position on the measure. The presiding officer will alternate recognition for debate between those in support and those in opposition to the measure. Members may yield to other members for questions if they wish, but that time expended for the question and answer will count against their allotted time. By the same token, a member can refuse to yield for questions. In all cases, the supporters of the measure, normally represented by the author, speak last.
Once the debate is closed, the presiding officer will declare the vote. The vote is recorded on the electronic roll call, and members can change their votes until the presiding officer closes the vote. House rules require each vote on final passage to be held open for at least two minutes, or for a shorter period if the presiding officer determines all members recorded as present have voted. Fifty-one votes in the House of Representatives or twenty-five votes in the Senate are required for a bill to pass. Another vote is required if the bill contains an emergency clause (or a special election provision for a legislative referendum) that would make the bill effective upon signature of the governor. That vote requires the approval of 68 House members or 32 Senate members. The emergency clause requires a separate vote. This may not actually occur, unless there are objections, when the bill passes with the two-thirds majority. If the emergency should fail, the bill will advance but without the emergency clause. Bills without emergencies cannot take effect until after 90 days following sine die adjournment of the Legislature and may be subject to a popular referendum to reject all or part of the bill. Revenue bills are not subject to the emergency. Unless they receive a three-fourths majority in both houses (76 in the House of Representatives and 36 in the Senate), they must be approved by a popular vote at the next general election. Note that the vote requirements are not dependent on the number of members present or currently elected, but to the number of members who constitute the respective chamber.
Joint rules also state that a conference committee on a measure will include three members from each house, unless otherwise specified by the House Speaker or the President Pro Tempore of the Senate. They appoint the members of conference committees from their respective bodies. The principal authors of the bill frequently are included on the conference committee. However, the appointment of the members of a conference committee is crucial to the fate of the bill. The first-named conferee of the house of origin serves as the conference committee chair and schedules the meetings of the committee. Conference committees are staffed by House and Senate staff. Rules provide that the conference committee cannot conduct business unless a quorum is present. Any committee member may request a roll call of the conference committee to determine the presence of a quorum. In practice, conference committees may never formally meet, but the measure will be signed out of committee by circulating a conference report.
The appointment of persons with different ideas than the principal authors on the measure can result in the bill being held in conference or substantial revision of the bill in order for the bill to be reported out of conference. In some cases, opposition from conferees of one or both chambers can be so strong that the bill will not be reported out favorably. As noted above, joint rules provide that the conference committee may only consider matters in disagreement between the two houses or matters germane to the measure. If other issues are added to the measure, such matters can be questioned as to their germaneness in the conference committee or on the floor of either house where the presiding officer under joint rules can determine if the rules have been violated. Should that be the case, the bill may be returned to conference.
When a bill is referred to a conference committee, it may be accompanied by "instructions" from either house to its conferees regarding what should be in the report. By rule, instructions can be made only during the consideration of a measure (instructions also can be added if a measure is re-referred to committee from the House or Senate floor) or conference committee report. These instructions tie the hands of the conferees from the house that adopted the instructions. If the conferees cannot accept the instructions, the conferees must attempt to get the instructions removed or altered so that the conference committee can write its report.
A conference committee must act on the engrossed amendments by accepting or rejecting each engrossed amendment from the second house in the committee's report. The action of the conference committee is reflected in the conference committee report. The report may be one page, containing information about the committee's decision on the engrossed amendments and/or conference amendments. Very often, the report will reject all amendments and include an attached conference committee substitute. The conference committee report must be signed by a majority of the conferees of each house before the measure can be reported from conference. The report is prepared by the staff of the committee or the conference committee chair's secretary and submitted to the clerk's office of the house of origin.
A conference committee report cannot be amended or altered in any way during consideration by either house. The report first goes to the house of origin where it may be accepted or rejected. Adoption of the report only requires a majority of members voting. If the report is rejected, another conference may be requested. Occasionally, new members may be appointed. If the report is approved in the house of origin, a vote on the final passage of the bill occurs once again. Debate on the bill is allowed at this stage (Fourth Reading), but no amendments are allowed. Debate rules are the same as for Third Reading. Just as on Third Reading, the vote will be on the bill and another vote, if necessary, on the emergency. It is possible that the measure can pass, but not the emergency, thereby forcing the opposite house to decide whether or not to approve the measure without the emergency or to reject the report and send the bill for further conference. The opposite house will have the opportunity to adopt or reject the report unless the house of origin rejects the report or the measure itself.
If additional conference is required as described above, the next product of the conference process will be reflected as a "second conference report." It is common for a measure to be considered several times by conference committees and that several conference reports and conference substitutes will be prepared.
If no compromise or agreement is reached, the measure will "die" in that conference committee after sine die adjournment of either session of a Legislature. Thus, it is very important that any such measures in the first regular session of a Legislature be reported out of conference indicating that no agreement has been reached. Legislative rules state that bills still in conference at the end of a session of the Legislature cannot be carried over from the first to the second session of the Legislature.
There are several major conference committees that the Legislature formally utilizes each session. For appropriation bills, the Oklahoma Legislature uses the General Conference Committee on Appropriations, divided into subcommittees, to bring into final form and balance the state's budget. This conference committee is much larger than most conference committees. As many as 50 or more members from the two houses will serve as members or alternates to GCCA. In recent years, the Senate has appointed all 48 of its members to the GCCA. The Legislature also utilizes a conference committee for retirement laws. Other conference committees will be created to review measures on a particular subject in order to combine those bills or to hammer out a consistent program on the subject.
Joint Rule 13 provides that appropriations bills take precedence over all other bills in the Legislature. In fact, the Legislature strives to pass the budget bills at least five days before sine die adjournment each year. This ensures that the governor will be unable to use the pocket veto and that the Legislature will have an opportunity to override any vetoes to those budget bills.
Once the legislature adjourns sine die, the governor can take up to 15 days following adjournment (including Sundays) to either sign the measure or exercise the "pocket veto" provision allowed in the Constitution. This power to "pocket veto" bills at the end of the session enables those measures that the governor objects to becoming law to be vetoed by simply refusing to sign them. No reasons for the veto are required, and no override is possible.
Article VI, Section 12 of the Constitution also makes provision for the governor's line-item veto powers on appropriation measures. All bills passed by the legislature "making appropriations of money embracing distinct items" are subject to the line-item veto powers of the governor. Unlike non-appropriation measures in which the veto is on the entire measure, governors can be selective of what items they will veto in an appropriation bill. The remainder of the measure can, unless the legislature overrides, become law. The line-item veto provision has, based on a State Supreme Court action, also embraced substantive language in the appropriations bill, particularly when that language relates to the vetoed appropriations. If the governor line-item vetoes any substantive language in an appropriation bill, all substantive language is vetoed. A controversial 1991 Oklahoma Supreme Court decision directs the governor to veto measures that violate the constitutional one-subject provision.
The governor's veto powers and the presentment clause do not apply to measures passed by the Legislature for voter approval through the referendum process or simple and concurrent resolutions. Revenue-raising bills that pass the legislature but fail to achieve the three-fourths majority approval from both houses of the legislature must be presented to the governor for signature and must be approved by voters before they become law. Such revenue-raising measures, pursuant to Article V, Section 33 of the Oklahoma Constitution, can only be considered at the next general election.